Plain Statement of Facts for use in Hong Kong COVID Legal Cases
Illegal detention; Fraud; Malfeasance all very obvious
1. Hong Kong reported its first two cases of COVID-19 on 22nd January 2020.
2. On 30th January 2020 the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.
3. Hong Kong reported its first death from the coronavirus on Tuesday 4th February 2020. A 39-year-old man, who had an underlying illness, had taken the high-speed train from Hong Kong to Wuhan city in Hubei province on 21st January 2020 and from Changsha in Hunan province to Hong Kong on 23rd January 2020.
4. On 11th March 2020 the WHO declared the COVID-19 situation to be a global pandemic.
5. In early 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic was announced to the world, the claim was made that SARS-CoV-2 (the purported cause of COVID-19 disease) was a novel virus to which there was no natural immunity, therefore this “novel” disease was highly dangerous and required unprecedented response.
6. Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam announced various containment measures to prevent the spread of the SARS COV2 virus
a. Hong Kong closed its border to all incoming non-residents arriving from overseas on 25th March 2020. Transiting through Hong Kong was no longer allowed.
b. All returning residents, regardless of point of departure, were subject to the Compulsory Quarantine Order, which required all to stay at a reported quarantine premise (either home or hotel) for 14 days.
c. Tracking devices were employed to enforce the order. All returning residents from the United States, the UK, and continental Europe were required to go through enhanced screening and submit a saliva sample for COVID-19 testing.
d. Indoor and outdoor public gatherings of more than four people were banned, initially for 14 days, starting from 29 March 2020.
e. Other regulations were enacted including requiring restaurants to operate at half their capacity and to set tables at least 1.5 meters apart.
f. An order was made for closure of karaoke bars and many types of entertainment venues for 14 days from 1st April 2020.
7. On 28 July 2020 Secretary for Food and Health Sophia Chan stated that there was "empirical evidence" that quarantine exemption policies for over 30 groups of inbound travellers – including cross-boundary goods vehicle drivers, aircraft crew members, government officials on duty, and numerous company executives – had contributed to the recent increase in coronavirus cases. As a result:
a. Social-distancing rules were further toughened by limiting public gatherings to two people.
b. Wearing of face masks was made compulsory in all public places.
c. A ban was introduced on eating-in at restaurants. This move was highly unpopular with the public amid images of workers eating food on roadsides in the heat and rain. It ended in a government U-turn after 48 hours.
8. In September 2020 Secretary for Food and Health Sophia Chan pointed out that the virus would not disappear before effective vaccines were made available. She also emphasized that the relaxation of social distancing measures would be staged and conditional.
9. From the beginning of the announced pandemic the government of Hong Kong (and governments around the world) have maintained the position that “there is no prevention or cure for COVID-19” and that population wide vaccination would be the only exit strategy out of the COVID-19 pandemic.
a. An article published by the Virology Journal dated August 22, 2005 titled “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread” concluded that “Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection.”
b. Around March 2020, Dr Vladimir Zelenko, a physician based in New York state, US, started using Hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc Sulphate to successfully treat SARS-CoV-2 infection in a community in New York State. His preliminary findings were published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents in December 2020
c. Hydroxychloroquine (“HCQ”) has been in use for over 65 years and has been used billions of times throughout the entire world without restriction. As of 2020 it was listed in the WHO list of essential medicines. For many decades it has been given to: pregnant women, breastfeeding women, children, elderly patients, immune compromised patients and healthy persons.
d. With more than 5.6 million prescriptions in the USA, HCQ was the 128th most commonly prescribed medication in 2017.
e. The WHO list of essential medicines can be accessed at https://list.essentialmeds.org/ where you can search for hydroxychloroquine.
f. In May 2020 the Hong Kong Drug Office under the Department of Health put out warnings concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19, stating on their website that “chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, given the serious side effects that can result from treatment with these medicines.”
g. A study published in The Lancet on 22 May 2020 made warnings regarding the use of HCQ due to ineffectiveness and propensity for heart and eye complications.
h. Subsequent events demonstrated that the Lancet study on Hydroxychloroquine had in fact been fraudulent and the paper was retracted, but only after global media had used the results of the fraudulent Lancet study to effectively cause a global moratorium on the use of Hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19.
i. A white paper written by Dr. Simone Gold, founder of America’s Front Line Doctors, demonstrates the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine.
j. As of 9 May 2022 meta-analysis of 342 studies on Hydroxychloroquine from 5,399 scientists over 457,980 patients in 50 countries show statistically significant improvement for mortality, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance after the use of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19. This meta-analysis was already available in early 2021.
k. The 342 studies in 8 (m) above show 63% improvement for early treatment and 19% improvement for late treatment.
l. There is significant evidence to demonstrate that powerful individuals within government agencies in the US and other countries took various steps to block the use of Hydroxychloroquine (and other drugs that could be used off-label) for the treatment of COVID-19.
m. After the use of HCQ was essentially shut down worldwide due to the publicity generated by the fraudulent Lancet paper and given the fact that HCQ and other drugs did not appear to be very effective in treating late stage COVID-19, doctors and researchers around the world continued searching for other available drugs that could be repurposed to effectively treat COVID-19.
n. Beginning March 2020 the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) created the life-saving MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol for COVID-19, which is intended for hospitalized patients.
o. In October 2020 FLCCC developed the I-MASK+ Prophylaxis & Early Outpatient Treatment Protocol for COVID-19, which is designed for use as a prophylaxis and in early outpatient treatment, for those who test positive for COVID-19. The above two protocols complement each other, and both are physiologic-based combination treatment regimens developed by leaders in critical care medicine.
p. All the component medicines in the MATH and I-MASK protocols are FDA-approved, inexpensive, readily available and have been used for decades with well-established safety profiles.
q. Ivermectin is a well-known, FDA-approved anti-parasitic drug that has been used successfully for more than four decades to treat Onchocerciasis “river blindness” and other parasitic diseases. It’s safety profile, and the studies showing that it had anti-viral properties, made it an excellent choice for off-label use to treat COVID-19. Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs known. It is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines, has been given 3.7 billion times around the globe, and has won the Nobel prize for its global and historic impacts in eradicating endemic parasitic infections in many parts of the world.
r. On 31 March 2021 the WHO advised that Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 should only be used in clinical trials.
s. In October 2020, FLCCC added Ivermectin as a core medication in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19.
t. Beginning early 2021 the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the US, the CDC, and the WHO began recommending against the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID-19 unless it was being used in a clinical trial.
u. Around the same time, social media and international mainstream media began broadly “branding” Ivermectin as “horse paste” – a derogatory term to suggest that it was for veterinary use only.
v. It is considered that the negative portrayal by international organisations such as WHO, and mainstream media towards Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine substantively supported the narrative that “there is no preventative or cure for COVID-19”.
w. The supposed “lack of a preventative or cure” for COVID-19 is a critical point because, IF any available treatment was acknowledged by the medical authorities in Malaysia, or the US, or other jurisdictions, under LAW the emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines could not be given.
x. As of 22 April 2022 real-time meta-analysis of 82 studies on Ivermectin globally shows statistically significant improvements for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions.
y. As of June 2022 many countries and locales around the world have adopted Ivermectin for treating COVID-19 including Brazil, Peru, Paraguay, Belize, Macedonia, Japan, and the state of Uttar Pradesh in Northern India.
z. Countries that allowed/promoted the use of Ivermectin either did not experience large COVID-19 waves or, as with Delhi and Uttar Pradesh in India, after the introduction of Ivermectin as a treatment, COVID-19 was quickly brought under control.
10. It is considered that the negative portrayal by Health Officials throughout the World towards Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine substantively supported the narrative that “there is no preventative or cure for COVID-19”. The supposed “lack of a preventative or cure” for COVID-19 is a critical point because, IF any available treatment was acknowledged by the medical authorities in the US, or other jurisdictions, under LAW the emergency use authorization (“EUA”) for the COVID-19 vaccines could not be given.
a. The US FDA’s own rules for the approval of an EUA includes the following: “FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.” (our highlight)
b. An obvious tactic to get an EUA approved for a new, untested drug or medical technology would be to block approval of any other treatment modality that could be shown to be effective against a disease that was causing an emergency.
c. On 17 January 2022 a criminal complaint filed with the Office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton specifically named the individuals and institutions responsible for actively blocking the use of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, among other treatments, in order to ensure the smooth passage of EUA for the novel and untested COVID-19 vaccines, especially the mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer, Moderna, and others.
11. Throughout 2020 and 2021 scientific bodies such as the WHO and CDC, with support from Mainstream Media and “fact checkers”, informed the public that there was no evidence of natural immunity to SARS-COV-2 or that natural immunity to SARS-COV-2 was much less robust than vaccine induced immunity, and that SARS COV-2 infection would not lead to lasting natural immunity. This position was also used to justify COVID-19 vaccines as the only viable hope for ending the COVID-19 “pandemic”.
12. Between 19 June 2020, and 13 November 2020 the WHO went so far as to remove natural immunity as a key component of herd immunity from their website.
13. The presence and importance of natural immunity to COVID-19 was consistently and broadly ignored and downplayed by both the media and Government officials through 2020 and 2021.
14. The supposed lack of evidence of natural immunity from exposure to SARS-COV-2 virus or any other coronavirus infection, publicly claimed by the WHO and CDC among others, was used as another reason for approval of the EUA for COVID-19 vaccines, and the subsequent push for universal inoculation with the novel COVID-19 vaccines.
a. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, for example, stated in her October 2020 published LANCET statement that “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” and that “the consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future”
b. Hong Kong’s official guidance followed the international pattern of downplaying and/or ignoring the importance of natural immunity to SARS COV-2 which was either already present in the population prior to January 2020 or acquired following a natural SARS COV-2 infection.
c. Public communications concerning natural infections from COVID-19 stressed that relying on natural immunity would be dangerous and lead to many deaths, and therefore vaccines needed to be the centre point to stop the COVID-19 pandemic.
d. Vaccines were touted by representatives of the Hong Kong government as the only route to achieving herd immunity.
15. Multiple scientific papers, from many different countries, confirm that natural immunity to COVID-19 is significantly higher than immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccinations.
a. As of 26 November 2021 The Brownstone Institute had listed 132 research studies that affirmed the presence and importance of naturally acquired immunity to COVID-19.
b. Natural immunity provides greater than 99% protection against Covid-19.
c. Vaccine immunity is well below the 99% level of protection even directly after vaccination and from there rapidly wanes.
d. Vaccine immunity does not prevent infection and transmission of the SARS COV-2 virus, while natural exposure for the most part creates immunity which prevents infection and transmission of viruses including SARS-COV-2.
e. As of August 2021, in the more than 19 months that the world had been transfixed by the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence at that stage showed that the reinfection rate after natural infection was less than 1%, and there were no documented cases of reinfection and transmission to others by naturally immune individuals.
f. A comparison of 42,000 naturally immune individuals with 62,000 fully vaccinated individuals found that the fully vaccinated individuals were 6 to 13 times more likely to get infected than the naturally immune.
g. Data and studies reflect that natural immunity provides sterilizing immunity while vaccination does not provide sterilizing immunity.
h. The failure of the CDC to address factual questions from lawyer Aaron Siri acting on behalf of Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) appears to confirm that there has never been a single documented case of reinfection (of naturally infected people) resulting in further transmission of COVID-19, while, in contrast, there are numerous documented cases of breakthrough cases (following vaccination) resulting in further transmission.
i. Real-world data shows that the naturally immune have more robust and durable T cell and B cell immunity.
j. By November 2020 research was being published showing that a significant majority of the global population was likely to have SARS-CoV-2 reactive T-cells because of prior exposure to flu and CMV viruses, in addition to common cold-causing coronaviruses. In other words, a significant proportion of the population was already pre-immune to COVID-19.
k. A study published in July 2020 showed that significant numbers of the population appear to already have immunity to SARS-CoV-2 most likely as a result of interacting with other corona viruses.
l. In January 2021 the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) knew that the immune systems of more than 95% of people who recovered from COVID- 19 had durable memories of the virus up to eight months after infection.
m. A paper in Nature in June 2021 also demonstrated that post-COVID immunity would be long term.
16. Despite evidence of the efficacy of prophylaxis and in early outpatient treatment protocols and likely natural immunity within the population, COVID-19 vaccines were granted EUA approval by the Hong Kong Secretary for Food and Health Sophia Chan under Subsidiary Regulation CAP 599K
a. Sinovac - 18th February 2021
b. Pfizer BioNTech - 10th March 2021
17. The Government’s stated goal at the beginning of the vaccine roll-out in Hong Kong was to get 50 per cent of the Special Administrative Regions approximately 7.4 million people fully vaccinated.
a. The population was told that the COVID-19 vaccines were “safe and effective” and that to get vaccinated was to do one’s societal duty.
b. The population was told that getting multiple doses of the COVID-19 vaccines was a must if they were to protect their health, and the pandemic to be stopped.
c. On 22nd April 2021 Scientific Committee on Emerging & Zoonotic Diseases Chairman Prof David Hui there are no known risks associated with administering mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to lactating women, they are recommended to receive the mRNA vaccines as for the rest of the population.
d. Professor Lau Yu-lung who chairs the government’s scientific committee on vaccine preventable diseases proposed incentives such as allowing full-day sessions for schools which achieve more than 70 per cent vaccine take-up among eligible pupils
e. On 20th January 2022 the government stated that the COVID-19 vaccines were safe for children aged 5-11, recommending both Sinovac and Pfizer BioNTech vaccines
18. On 22nd April 2021 Centre for Health Protection Controller Dr Ronald Lam said that he looked forward to herd immunity to COVID-19 building up in the city stating that “It is critically important that our Hong Kong citizens, even after they have completed the full course of vaccination, to maintain so-called non-pharmaceutical measures, including proper mask use, very vigilant hand hygiene and maintaining good ventilation, etc. The reason being that still, the vaccine coverage rate right now is not as high as what we have expected and we look forward to reasonable herd immunity build-up before the relaxation of other measures.”
19. On 29th April 2021 the Hong Kong government declared mandatory testing and vaccination for foreign domestic helpers, principally from the Philippines and Indonesia, after cases were discovered, but reversed the decision in May 2021 following criticisms from labour organisations of discrimination.
20. On 2nd August 2021 chief executive Carrie Lam announced a new drive to raise the city's vaccination rate by making inoculations compulsory for four sectors: civil servants, healthcare workers, care home staff and school-teachers
a. The Hong Kong government also increased the pressure on the local population to get vaccinated, saying that only schools which achieve a 70% vaccination level among students in the grade can fully resume in-person teaching in September 2021
b. Many companies informed employees that if they were not injected with a COVID-19 vaccine they would be put on unpaid leave or dismissed from their jobs.
21. On 8th February 2022 chief executive Carrie Lam made public statements to the effect that she “would make life hard for unvaccinated people”.
a. Subsidiary Regulation 599L “Vaccine Pass Regulation” was introduced by the Secretary of Food and Health, Sophia Chan on 10th February 2022
b. From 24th February 2022 Non-vaccinated people were to be denied access to restaurants, shopping centres, and a large majority of services that are the right of people under the Basic Law of Hong Kong
c. The government stated that employers won't be considered to have made an "unreasonable dismissal" if they terminate staffers who cannot carry out their jobs at venues covered by the Vaccine Pass
22. Safety trial data for the Sinovac (Coronavac) vaccine has not been provided to the public for review
a. Phase 3 safety trials were performed in Brazil, Chile and several other countries
b. Brazilian trial data indicated a 50.4% efficacy rate
c. Chilean trial data indicated a 67% efficacy rate
23. The Hong Kong Government stated on multiple occasions, and through various channels, that the COVID-19 vaccines, including the mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer BioNTech, are “safe and effective”.
a. The COVID-19 vaccine produced by Pfizer BioNTech were granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in the United States of America.
b. In Hong Kong, vaccines on offer, including the mRNA vaccines, were available under emergency use provided that the vaccine had been approved by a regulatory authority in a place outside Hong Kong that performs the function of approving pharmaceutical products for use. Subsidiary Regulation 599K refers
24. None of the vaccines for COVID-19 have been available for long enough to provide any data about long term safety.
a. The process to confirm and test for longer term vaccine safety takes many years – often upwards of a decade
b. From the beginnings of use in March 2021, the new mRNA vaccines were approved under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) only in the United States of America i.e. they were not approved for general use
c. In other countries the COVID-19 vaccines were provided under various forms of conditional approval, similar in nature to the US EUA.
d. As per 23 above, vaccines in Hong Kong were available only for emergency use.
e. The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine is in Phase III clinical trials until February 2024
f. The Astrazeneca is in Phase III clinical trials until February 2023.
g. From the FDA letter to Pfizer on 23 August 2021 we know that after only 2 months of follow-up of trial participants post injection, a determination was made that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective.
h. Two months is far too short a time frame to identify issues that may develop beyond that very short time frame.
25. Evidence for actual safety and effectiveness of all the COVID-19 vaccines, especially the new mRNA types of COVID-19 vaccine, suggest that they are not safe or effective.
a. Claims made by Pfizer for the BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine were that their vaccine is 95% effective.
b. Moderna (NIH) was claimed by the manufacturer to be 94% effective.
c. Astra Zeneca and Janssen COVID vaccines were claimed to be around 66-67% effective.
d. The vaccine effectiveness estimates were based on Relative Risk Reduction, not Absolute Risk Reduction.
e. No trials looking at longer term safety issues have ever been done for any of the COVID-19 vaccines, because they have only been available since late 2020 or 2021 (depending on the vaccine). It is impossible at this stage to know what will happen in 5, 10, 15 or more years as a consequence of these inoculations, as only the passage of time will allow such research to be done.
f. Randomized control trial data from Pfizer, released under court order, has proved that the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine caused harm and was NOT safe. In the Pfizer clinical trial from BNT162b2, 20 people died in the vaccine arm of the study, while only 14 people died in the placebo arm of the study.
g. When Pfizer clinical trial participants were actively followed for adverse events (AEs) in the trials, high percentages of adverse events were reported. One study for NCT04368728 BNT162b2 using solicited data showed a 78% adverse event rate, with 5% severe adverse events.
h. Post marketing research done by Pfizer on their COVID-19 vaccine, also released under court order, showed many hundreds of side effects from the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine. Many of the conditions listed had never been heard of before the release of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
i. Pfizer and the FDA, when sued by PUBLIC HEALTH AND MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS FOR TRANSPARENCY in the US, tried to get a court to agree to prevent release of any of their clinical study data and post marketing data for a period of 75 years.
j. Based on their response to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, the subsequent lawsuit to force release of vaccine research information, and the attempt to delay release for 75 years, it seems clear that the FDA in cahoots with Pfizer tried to hide the research data about the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines from the public.
k. Pfizer’s post marketing research that has so far been released has shown that by 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports of Adverse Events (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events.
l. Following market release of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, by 28 February 2021 there had been 1223 deaths post-vaccination from the Pfizer COVID-19 shot.
m. On 24 January 2022, during US Senator Ron Johnson’s roundtable discussion, Dr Peter McCullough indicated the historical threshold for safety board’s stopping vaccine roll-outs was 25-50 deaths.
n. Due to the large number of spontaneous adverse events following the release of their COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer had to hire large numbers of full-time employees to handle the volume of adverse event reports. The actual numbers hired is unknown as Pfizer redacted this information in the documents released under court order.
o. On 29 September 2021, Ontario Public Health recommended young men 18-24 NOT take the Moderna shot, because of a 1 in 5,000 risk of myocarditis.
p. A paper posted on 23 June 2022 titled “Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA vaccination in randomized trials” concluded that Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest compared with placebos. The excess risk of serious adverse events found in the study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.
q. Despite the information about many possible serious side effects from the COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers chose to not communicate any side effects to the public, choosing instead to only repeat the phrase “safe and effective”. Vaccine package inserts for the COVID-19 vaccines that read “intentionally blank” have been discovered in various markets.
r. In May 2022 the US FDA limited the use of Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 inoculations due to the risk of blood clotting caused by this particular medicinal product.
s. US VAERS database and other vaccine injury reporting systems show that levels of death and injury specific to the COVID-19 inoculations are significantly higher than death or injury linked to any other vaccine in history.
t. Insurance companies are beginning to report large increases in medical claims related to vaccine injury. For instance, 400,000 Cases of COVID vaccine injuries have been found in data analysed by a German Health Insurer.
u. Researchers at Charité Berlin, Germany’s top hospital and one of Europe’s largest, have announced a high rate of severe side effects lasting months or longer based on a survey of about 40,000 Germans.
v. A World Health Organization endorsed study concludes that the risk of suffering serious injury due to COVID vaccination is 339% higher than the risk of being hospitalised with COVID-19.
w. Several countries are experiencing a surge of unexpected deaths, creating a significant (>40%) increase in All-Cause mortality in the 18-45 year old age group and this increased all-cause mortality has happened only in countries where a significant percentage of the population has received COVID-19 mRNA inoculations.
x. US Medicare Data shows a 50% rise in All-Cause Mortality following the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines and boosters.
y. Since the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines, athletes have been dying on the field at a rate many times higher than the background rate from all previous years. As of April 2020, 833 cardiac arrests and serious issues have occurred in athletes, with 540 Dead, following Covid injection.
z. In May 2021 FDA documents reveal 86% of children who participated in the Pfizer covid vaccine trial experienced adverse reactions.
aa. The link between the novel mRNA vaccines and heart inflammation in younger people was becoming clear by June 2021.
bb. As early as April 2021, the CDC noted that increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were reported in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna). Recent data show a 3.7% myocarditis rate amongst Americans who took the COVID-19 vaccine.
cc. Children and young people have been experiencing serious cardiac events, and neurological events, sometimes leading to death following their COVID-19 injections. Jessica Rose PhD published a paper in which she demonstrated that 574 children over the age of 12 were killed by the Covid-19 vaccines up to 16 July 2021.
dd. On 8 December 2021 Thanh Hoa Province’s CDC Director in Vietnam banned the Pfizer vaccine once 120 teens ended up hospitalized after a school group vaccination. Three children died following that vaccination.
ee. On 5 May 2022 a young boy died of myocarditis after receiving the third shot for kids aged 5-11. However, the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel and its director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, signed off on a third dose for the young age group despite their knowledge of the boy’s death.
ff. In June 2022 Søren Brostrøm, the director general of the Danish Health Authority, told TV 2 that depending on the information that has developed since late 2021, it was incorrect to generally immunize children.
gg. A large cohort study from Denmark published in April 2022 indicated that both first and second doses of mRNA vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, The risk of myocarditis was highest among young males (aged 16-24 years) after the second dose.
hh. In June 2021 evidence from the VAERS system showed that women were losing their babies after being injected with COVID-19 “vaccines”.
ii. By December 2021, exploration of the VAERS data showed that there were 2,809 fetal deaths following COVID-19 shots injected into pregnant and child-bearing women in the 11 months since the launch of the EUA COVID-19 vaccines. In contrast, using the exact same search parameters in VAERS, but excluding the COVID-19 shots, it was found that there was only a total of 2,168 fetal deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past 30+ years.
jj. In December 2021 questions were raised in Ontario’s Parliament by MPP Rick Nicholls about the explosive rise of stillbirths among fully vaccinated women in the country. Nicholls gave an example of Waterloo, Ontario where 86 cases of stillbirths have been reported in six months, compared to typically five to six per year.
kk. Data released by Pfizer (under court order), show clearly that shortly after the COVID-19 vaccines were introduced to the market many women who received the BioNTech (or similar) Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines lost their babies.
ll. It is noteworthy that pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials but these vaccines were then declared safe and effective for pregnant women.
mm. While pregnant women were excluded from the Pfizer internal studies, and thus from the EUA on which basis all pregnant women were assured the vaccine was “safe and effective”, nonetheless about 270 women got pregnant during the study. More than 230 of them were lost somehow to history (not followed up for some unknown reason). But of the 36 pregnant women whose outcomes were followed - 28 lost their babies.
nn. To put the entire “vaccines are safe” debate into perspective, an Oxford study has shown that less than 6% of “Approved” medical drugs are backed by “High-Quality Evidence” to support their benefits. “Harms” are significantly underreported across the board.
oo. There is overwhelming evidence from around the world to demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccines that have been forced on the public globally are by no means safe.
pp. Pathologists in Germany have done autopsies showing the very clear role that COVID-19 vaccines have played in bringing about death.
qq. Importantly, children and young people remain at low risk from COVID-19 making the risk-reward calculation for the COVID-19 vaccines extremely unfavourable.
26. Initially authorities made statements to the effect that taking the COVID-19 inoculation would prevent infection from SARS-CoV-2 (i.e. that the inoculations would be sterilizing).
a. Subsequently, the claim about effectiveness was changed to state that the COVID-19 inoculations only reduce severity of the disease and lower the risk of hospitalization and death.
b. More recent comments about efficacy made by Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, stated that the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine is not (no longer) effective at stopping COVID-19.
c. UK Government weekly COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 51, 2021 and Week 8, 2022 data show an increasing correlation of SARS COV-2 infection ‘vs’ number of doses administered. The reports show after 1, 2 and 3 doses of the mRNA inoculations an adult person (over 18 years of age) is more likely to develop Covid-19 symptoms compared to people who have had no inoculations at all.
d. Pfizer clinical trial data, released under court order, shows a Relative Risk Reduction of just 12% efficacy.
e. UK Government data also indicates NEGATIVE efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines after only a few months following inoculation, prompting 3rd and 4th dose recommendations.
f. Viral loading testing indicates that people who have received COVID-19 inoculations can carry equal or higher viral load to those who have not received an inoculation
27. Calculations based on the Numbers Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) show us that greater than one death from vaccine side effects is required in order to prevent one death with COVID-19.
28. Initially authorities around the world made statements to the effect that taking the COVID-19 inoculation would prevent infection from SARS-CoV-2 (i.e. that the inoculations would be sterilizing).
29. Subsequently, the claim about effectiveness was changed to state that the COVID-19 inoculations only reduce severity of the disease and lower the risk of hospitalization and death.
30. Evidence from public data sources, research studies and from the vaccine manufacturers and vaccine salesmen themselves show that the COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission, and that their effectiveness at preventing hospitalization or death is limited.
a. UK Government weekly COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report Week 51, 2021 and Week 8, 2022 data show an increasing correlation of SARS COV-2 infection ‘vs’ number of doses administered. The reports show after 1, 2 and 3 doses of the mRNA inoculations an adult person (over 18 years of age) is more likely to develop Covid-19 symptoms compared to people who have had no inoculations at all.
b. Official government data in the UK as of December 2021 showed that the Fully Vaccinated had accounted for 9 in every 10 Covid-19 Deaths since August 2021.
c. A study done in New York and posted in February 2022 showed that effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine against the “Omicron” variant rapidly dropped to only 12% after a few weeks.
d. UK Government data also indicates NEGATIVE efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines after only a few months following inoculation, prompting 3rd and 4th dose recommendations. By late February 2022, adults in England who had succumbed to three doses of the Covid-19 injections were up to three times more likely to be infected with Covid-19 than adults who are not vaccinated, with the latest UK Health Security Agency showing the Covid-19 injections have a negative effectiveness among the triple vaccinated as low as minus-206%.
e. What about the Mainland Chinese produced Sinovac Vaccine? According to the WHO: “A large phase 3 trial in Brazil showed that two doses (of Sinovac), administered at an interval of 14 days, had an efficacy of 51% against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, 100% against severe COVID-19, and 100% against hospitalization starting 14 days after receiving the second dose.”
f. Viral loading testing indicates that people who have received COVID-19 inoculations can carry equal or higher viral load to those who have not received an inoculation.
g. Statistical data show that rates of COVID-19 infection follow, and appear to be caused by, COVID-19 injections. COVID-19 is in fact listed as one of the adverse events following COVID-19 injections.
h. More recent comments about efficacy made by Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, stated that the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine is not (no longer) effective at stopping COVID-19.
i. During the May 2022 World Economic Forum, Bill Gates stated “We want vaccines that are infection blocking and long duration, which today, the vaccines have saved millions of lives but they don't have a much in a way of duration, they're not good in an infection blocking”
j. There is minimal evidence in Hong Kong showing that Existing “vaccines” are ineffective against the Omicron Variant – as acknowledged by Pfizer’s CEO. A 3rd dose is therefore claimed to be “necessary” so any person who had received fewer than 3 doses ahead of the 5th wave would not have “protection” for at least 4 months for a 3-dose protocol. However, evidence globally indicates “waves” naturally suppress themselves with or without other interventions, making the necessity of follow-on injections moot.
k. In the past, “Safe and Effective” typically accompanied medical products that underwent years and years of testing/research to obtain licensed approval. This level of testing and research has not been performed for any of the currently available COVID-19 inoculations.
l. In today’s world “safe and effective” should be considered marketing terminology and nothing more as there are no long-term safety studies available.
31. There is clear evidence that at least one of the COVID-19 vaccines has been approved on the basis of false pretences and fraud.
a. In October 2021 the Global Covid Summit released a declaration stating: “We declare that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, and their enablers, withheld and wilfully omitted safety and effectiveness information from patients and physicians, and should be immediately indicted for fraud.”. As of 8am ET on 1/18 over 17,000 doctors & scientists have signed the Rome Declaration.
b. With the court ordered release of the Pfizer data that the FDA and Pfizer had tried hide for 75 years, problems suggestive of fraud and data manipulation are coming to light.
c. In November 2021, Brook Jackson, a whistle-blower who worked on Pfizer’s Phase 3 COVID jab trial in late 2020 warned that she had seen evidence of fraud in the trial. Data were falsified, patients were unblinded, and follow up on reported side effects lagged way behind.
d. The whistle blower, Brook Jackson, has started a lawsuit against Pfizer’s subsidiary, Ventavia, under the US False Claims Act in a court located in the Eastern District of Texas.
e. In the Pfizer clinical trials, it appears that the FDA never checked around 94% of trial sites. It also appears some of the trial sites were purely fabricated.
f. At the 20 December 2021 FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Meeting, the FDA claimed that they were falsely mislead by Pfizer about the safety of the vaccine.
g. Risk-benefit analyses by pharma companies or regulators to compare the risk of illness and death from COVID-19 compared to the risk of injury and death from COVID-19 vaccines appear to have mostly used computer models rather than actual empirical data to come to conclusions about relative risks and benefits.
32. There is minimal evidence in Hong Kong that there was a deadly COVID-19 epidemic occurring during 2020 and 2021.
a. All-Cause mortality in Hong Kong indicates positive linear growth since 2018. This can partly be explained by an increase in the % of elderly persons >65 years of age within the population.
b. During 2019:
i. 48,706 deaths were recorded
ii. This figure represents 2,208 excess deaths above the 5-year moving average.
iii. This represents a 5% increase in deaths compared to the 5-year moving average
c. During 2020:
i. 50,653 deaths were recorded
ii. This figure represents 3,556 excess deaths above the 5-year moving average
iii. This represents an 8% increase in deaths compared to the 5-year moving average
iv. 148 deaths were reported with a link to COVID-19
v. 3,408 (95.8%) excess deaths are therefore attributable to causes other than SARS-COV-2
d. During 2021:
i. 51,536 deaths were recorded
ii. This figure represents 3,659 excess deaths above the 5-year moving average
iii. This represents an 8% increase in deaths compared to the 5-year moving average
iv. 65 deaths were reported with a link to COVID-19
v. 3,594 (98.2%) excess deaths are therefore attributable to causes other than SARS-COV-2
33. All-Cause mortality data during 2020, the first year of COVID-19, from countries around the world shows a mixed and varied picture. Many countries had average or lower than average All-Cause Mortality in 2020 which means there was nothing out of the ordinary and no evidence of a deadly disease that was decimating the population in those areas.
a. During the whole of 2020, compared to a 2015-2019 baseline, Hong Kong, Thailand, Singapore, Taiwan, New Zealand, Australia, Denmark, South Korea, Malaysia and other countries had almost no excess mortality that could be attributed COVID , or only minimal excess mortality which mostly can be explained by normal trends.
b. Sweden, the country which did not follow the global panic in response to COVID-19 (i.e. did not lock down or mask the entire country) had an excess mortality in 2020 higher than 2019, but lower than every year from 2002 to 2012.
c. There IS an increasing amount of data showing that there have been large increases in All-Cause Mortality in countries around the world that have high COVID-19 vaccination rates.
d. Significant increases in All-Cause Mortality, in many cases much greater than was seen in 2020, have occurred in various countries AFTER their roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccines.
e. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of COVID-19 as identified in sero-prevalence studies is around 0.15%, with most deaths happening in the very old and infirm. This is not significantly different to the IFR of influenza.
f. CDC data show that 95% of deaths in the US supposedly “caused” by COVID-19 (i.e. with COVID-19 listed on the death certificate) had multiple comorbidities, meaning that the deaths observed most likely could not be blamed on COVID-19 as the primary cause even though they were marked as COVID deaths.
g. There is important evidence showing that a significant portion of All-Cause Mortality increases are likely to have been caused by measures put in place by governments to stop COVID-19 in order to achieve what has been labelled “zero COVID”, rather than being caused by COVID-19 itself.
34. At the beginning of 2020, in the absence of any evidence from All-Cause Mortality data, and in the face of only a very few COVID-19 linked deaths worldwide, catastrophic death rates due to COVID-19 were predicted by a computer model.
a. The outputs of this computer model were used by governments around the world to justify their anti-COVID measures.
b. The computer model results that were used to predict catastrophic outcomes from COVID-19 were wildly inaccurate and overstated predicted death rates of the COVID-19 “pandemic” by several orders of magnitude, as evidenced by actual hospitalization and mortality data.
c. Overall, the evidence of a global pandemic in 2020 causing massive numbers of illness and death is both weak and patchy, and the reality that has unfolded has come nowhere close to the horrific scenarios painted by those responsible for the pandemic computer modelling.
d. Importantly, All-Cause Mortality data for most countries showed no change from the multi-year average for the first 3 to 6 months of 2020. This means that, globally, there is little to no evidence of a pandemic of DEATH occurring at the beginning of 2020 – the point in time at which the WHO announced a global pandemic.
35. The declaration of a pandemic without obvious numbers of increased deaths in many countries was achieved by a simple mechanism – a change in definition of the meaning of the word “pandemic”.
a. In 2009 the WHO changed the definition of “pandemic”, removing enormous numbers of death as one of the criteria required for the declaration of a pandemic.
b. The WHO definition of a pandemic from at least as early as January 2003 up until 2009 read: “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness” (our emphasis).
c. In the month leading up the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic the WHO definition was changed to read: “A disease epidemic occurs when there are more cases of that disease than normal. A pandemic is a worldwide epidemic of a disease. An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity.”
d. The WHO also made a second change in the definition, which was to drop the requirement for a new sub-type with a simple reassortant virus meaning that many seasonal flu viruses could be classified as pandemic influenza.
e. As a consequence of these changes in definition, in the almost total absence of increase in excess mortality, in 2020 the WHO were able to declare a global pandemic and trigger massive government actions around the world that, in effect, shut down the global economy.
f. Doctors writing about the change in the WHO definition for Pandemic have stated: “If the WHO guidelines in effect at the time that the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus was identified in the USA in April 2009 then it would never have been declared a pandemic as it was not a new sub-type, was not causing enormous numbers of deaths and illness, and a significant number of people had already been exposed to an immunogenically similar virus.”
36. Without the new WHO pandemic definition put in place just before H1N1, given the very low number of deaths connected to COVID-19 when the pandemic was announced, and given what is now known about the COVID era All-Cause Mortality data it would also never have been possible to declare a pandemic for COVID-19. The new definition, removing death as a criterion, was critical in the announcement of a global health emergency.
37. Without the need to show enormous numbers of death, in order to declare a pandemic, the WHO only needed to show that “there are more cases of that disease than normal”. This was achieved through wide-scale testing.
a. The main evidence used by the WHO, and governments around the world, to claim that the world was in the middle of a “deadly pandemic” was the Polymerase Chain Reaction test (PCR).
b. The widespread use of the PCR test allowed the generation of many thousands of COVID-19 “cases”, irrespective of whether or not people showed any symptoms. A positive PCRT test alone was used to claim that a COVID-19 “case” had been identified.
c. Case numbers coming from PCR tests were reported by mainstream media and various websites on a daily basis, with the sharp growth in “case” numbers leading to the generation of fear within the population.
d. The PCR test is not able to identify the difference between live virus and dead viral material.
e. A PCR test cannot prove that a person is ill with a particular disease.
f. The PCR test was never designed to identify the presence or absence of disease.
g. The PCR test was designed to identify the presence of certain defined genetic material and magnify it to the point that it could be measured.
h. The identification of genetic material via PCR test could therefore be used to help explain the origin of symptoms in an ill individual displaying symptoms of disease.
i. The PCR test is a manufacturing technique that multiplies genetic material found in a sample, with each round of multiplication being called a cycle.
j. Studies have shown that the optimal number of cycles required to identify the presence of live virus that may be connected with an actual viral infection is 25 cycles.
k. Around the world, a range of 35 to 45 cycles has been used in the testing for SARS-CoV-2.
l. At the cycle thresholds (CT) commonly used to test for SARS-CoV-2, a majority of the identified positive cases have, in fact, been false positives i.e. there is no actual virus present, but the test shows a positive result.
m. False positives from the PCR test being run to test for SARS-CoV-2 are likely in the range of 90-97%.
n. The PCR test is not and never was a fit-for-purpose tool to identify the presence or absence of “diseased” people in the population.
o. The use of the PCR test as the sole arbiter of “sickness” was the main driver of panic around the COVID-19 situation.
38. Based on guidelines from the WHO, a COVID death is considered any death which follows a positive PCR test and/ or which a doctor or medical professional BELIEVES was due to COVID – irrespective of the presence of other serious comorbidities.
a. CDC data in the US show that 95% of deaths marked as COVID-19 had several comorbidities and it was these that were the most likely cause of death.
b. Freedom of Information request provided by the Hong Kong Government indicated that 91% of deaths up to 18 March 2022 during the 5th Wave of COVID-19 infections were due to “unknown causes”.
c. Official government data released in Ireland in June 2022 shows that the numbers of deaths claimed by media and data channels such as Worldometer overstated the number of deaths due to COVID-19 by many orders of magnitude.
d. A court case in Portugal forced the exploration of numbers of COVID-19 deaths in the country, and even though the government alleged 17,000 “COVID DEATHS” the court decided that only 152 deaths could be attributed to COVID-19 as the death certificates for those deaths had been issued by the prosecutor’s office. In other words, the court ignored death certificates issued by the health system.
39. A core claim of the WHO, the CDC, and many governments around the world including the Hong Kong government, has been that people who show no symptoms of illness can and do transmit SARS-CoV-2 to others. This has been referred to as “asymptomatic transmission”.
a. The belief in “asymptomatic transmission” was the basis upon which many measures to “stop the spread” of COVID-19 were established and enforced, including the physical distancing of people, mask wearing, hand sanitization for everybody, etc.
b. Most Epidemiologists indicate that, historically, epidemics have never been driven by asymptomatic transmission.
c. Head of the NIH Dr. Anthony Fauci is on public record stating that epidemics have never been driven by asymptomatic transmission.
d. No studies are available globally to show that asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 does, in fact occur.
e. Multiple studies are available globally to show that asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 is insignificant in driving the spread of the disease.
f. A major driver of the “pandemic” narrative has been the unsupported belief that healthy people are in fact sick because a not-fit-for-purpose test says so.
g. The redefining of “healthy” into “sick and asymptomatic” has been a major factor in maintaining high levels of panic around the world, making people fear everyone around them in case (based on the narrative) they may be carrying a deadly pathogen.
40. During the COVID “era”, COVID-19 “cases” have been counted cumulatively. This means that rather than looking at annual numbers, the data that one sees about COVID published through multiple channels is a total of ALL COVID cases from the beginning of 2020 up until the present time.
a. This approach serves to heighten concerns in the population because it exaggerates the numbers of COVID cases beyond what has already happened using PCR tests with large percentages of false positive results.
41. The COVID-19 pandemic was initially declared based on erroneous and frightening computer models, following which it was maintained by flawed diagnostic testing, public data presentations designed to generate fear, and mass media generated hysteria without any legitimate evidence of significant death directly caused by the virus labelled SARS-CoV-2.
42. On 27 January 2022, Mr Stephen Petty, Certified Industrial Hygienist, Certified Safety Professional, and Certified Engineer provided a presentation to the New Hampshire Legislature in the US. On 30 March 2022 Mr Petty testified at the New Hampshire Senate Committee on Health and Human Services regarding the mandatory use of masks in the school environment:
a. Mr Petty explained in Industrial Hygiene, solutions with 90% relative risk reduction must be used
b. The Hierarchy of Controls (1950+) in order of effectiveness
i. Substitution/Elimination (not applicable to SARS-COV-2)
ii. Engineering Controls (Dilution, Destruction, Containment)
iii. Administrative Controls (Reduction of Exposure time)
iv. Personal Protective Equipment
c. Personal Protective Equipment is considered the least effective method to control exposure to viruses
d. Medical doctors are not certified Industrial Hygienists
i. They are not experts in the field of workplace or public safety when it comes to real threats and solutions.
ii. They are not even considered experts in these fields regarding a hospital or clinical settings.
e. The only thing that has any hope of reducing exposure to a virus is an actual respirator, and even that is the last thing you should try if the goal is mitigation to exposure.
i. Cloth and Surgical masks are ineffective and make communication more difficult (verbal and non-verbal).
ii. N95 masks are rated to stop 95% of the particles 0.3 microns or
larger – COVID, a virus, is at ~0.1 microns – much smaller.
iii. N95 masks will likely increase harms and health effects.
f. Engineering Controls are considered to be the best way of mitigating viral transmission.
i. Dilution and/or Ventilation
1. More Fresh Air
2. Increase the number of air changes per hour within buildings (above 6x for 95% relative risk reduction)
ii. Destruction
1. Needle point ionisation technology
2. Ionised hydrogen peroxide
3. Nanostrike Air Purifier and Disinfection Technology
4. Silver Nano Particles
43. On 20 December 2021, Dr Paul Alexander published on the Brownstone Institute a compilation of more than 150 Comparative Studies and Articles on Mask Ineffectiveness and Harms
a. Evidence implies that face masks can be harmful especially to children.
b. The body of evidence indicates that face masks are largely ineffective.
44. In February 2022 professional experts in the field of industrial hygiene, with combined experience of nearly 150 years, wrote to the CDC challenging the CDC guidelines on the use of masks to try to combat COVID-19. Their conclusion was simple: “The guidance is overly broad, inaccurate, and especially inappropriate for children and the general public.”
45. The Prevention and Control of Disease (Use of Vaccines) Regulation Cap. 599K states that “a vaccine….is intended to stimulate a person’s immune system to produce immunity to the specified disease.”
a. The Hong Kong government has stated in a freedom of information request that 70% of people who were infected with Covid-19 had received a COVID-19 inoculation.
b. This matches information from many countries around the world, and information from vaccine manufacturers, who have stated that COVID-19 vaccines do not confer immunity upon the recipient.
46. Given 45 above, it is considered unreasonable for the government of Hong Kong to restrict the freedom of access and movement of individuals who have not received a COVID-19 inoculation. This action is considered discriminatory and unlawful.
47. All the measures taken to combat the so-called “COVID pandemic” were, in large part, in direct contravention to WHO and national government pandemic preparedness plans prepared over many years.
48. Courts around the world have made judgements concerning the validity and/or legality of measures used by various governments to curb COVID-19
a. The US Supreme court has ruled that vaccine mandates that prevent unvaccinated people from working are unconstitutional
b. The Indian supreme court has ruled that mandating vaccination or using any form of coercion to force people to get vaccinated, is a violation of the constitution and multiple human rights laws.
c. A court in Penang ruled that the COVID-19 vaccines in Malaysia are voluntary.
d. The New Zealand High Court ruled that vaccine mandates for police and defence force personnel was not lawful, partly due to the fact that both vaccinated and unvaccinated people can become infected with COVID-19.
49. Most of the facts about the actual situation with COVID-19 or about the risks of the COVID-19 vaccines, or about alternative treatments that are very effective at treating COVID-19 have been unknown, or dismissed, by a majority of the population, both in Hong Kong and worldwide, especially during 2020 and 2021.
50. The reason that this important information is unknown or dismissed is that massive censorship has been applied around the world to prevent any information that contradicts the “vaccines are safe and effective” mantra from being countered in any way.
a. Mainstream media organisations almost universally refused to publish materials that were sharing information viewed as contrary to official statements about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccines.
b. Alternatively, the same mainstream media organisations would publish smears and hit pieces on doctors and scientists who were sharing information about effective treatments and approaches to dealing with COVID-19. The hit pieces were sometimes focused on the individuals, and sometimes focused on the approaches they were sharing.
c. Internationally renowned doctors and scientists were blocked or removed from YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and other platforms for daring to share views that were opposed to the official narrative about COVID-19 and the COVID-19 vaccines.
d. Doctors who dared to speak up about their concerns around the COVID-19 situation, or the COVID-19 vaccines, were disciplined by professional medical boards or fired from their jobs.
e. Governments in certain countries, such as Malaysia, passed laws making the sharing of information about COVID-19 vaccine safety or efficacy, or information about COVID-19 that does not follow the official narrative, a criminal offense.
f. People in Hong Kong have been charged and fined for spreading so-called “misinformation” related to COVID-19.
51. The other reason that most people are unaware of the realities of the COVID-19 situation and the vaccine roll-outs is the massive, global propaganda campaign, funded with billions of dollars, to push the narrative that COVID-19 is deadly and has no cures, and that the COVID-19 vaccine is the only way out of this deadly situation.
a. The World Health Organisation produced a “Behavioural Insights” manual to be used by countries around the world to employ techniques of psychological manipulation and propaganda to drive vaccine uptake within various populations.
b. Contrary to what is required for the process of informed consent, The American Medical Association produced a guide for doctors on how to use specific communication techniques to “sell vaccines” and deal with objections from patients.
c. In the UK various “communications” groups funded by the UK government, including military propaganda organizations, were engaged in developing and applying wide scale propaganda in order to drive compliance with the official COVID-19 and vaccine narratives.
d. Many countries were discovered to be spending significant sums of money to create marketing and advertising campaigns in order to push the official COVID-19 and vaccine narratives.
e. Around the world governments literally bribed people to take the COVID-19 vaccinations, using anything from a free hamburger to entries in lotteries where the winner could make significant sums of money.
f. Some of the money paid to the organizations that were tasked with “COVID-19 messaging” went to Fact Checkers and online bots and trolls whose main role appeared to be gaslighting and smearing of doctors, scientists and members of society who questioned the COVID-19 and vaccine narratives.
52. The WHO is funded to a significant degree by Bill Gates, giving him significant influence over the organisation.
53. Bill Gates is on record stating that his investments in vaccines have been his most profitable business endeavour ever.
54. The International Health Regulations which were agreed by 190 nations in 2005 essentially outsourced the decision making around announcing pandemics to the WHO.
55. The WHO has no responsibility for any of the outcomes that may derive from WHO announcements, “recommendations”, guidance or decisions concerning pandemics.
56. The WHO has legal immunity in Switzerland.
Documentary evidence for all statements above is available for those wishing to confirm facts before putting legal actions into motion.
So what? What’s the point of writing all this?